The purpose of a film review in a magazine is to objectively analyse the subject matter and give readers a fair judgement and assessment for them to learn from however, these reviews can be presented in a number of ways.
Above is one I analysed of Bruce Hunt’s “The Cave”. It’s a double page spread, which is what our review is intended to be, and has a variety of elements that define it as a magazine’s review which are highlighted above. Along with the critical body of the review, many things are added in to visually aid the viewer and to catch their attention such as the large image on the right and the star rating system.
If you look at this analysis, many of the things highlighted in the review of “The Cave” are also featured in this review of “A Serious Man”. There’s a formula to these texts that needs to be added into my own work.
Above you’ll find two magazine reviews from the same magazine. The differences are the film and the time of publication. Whilst the “Pirates of the Caribbean” text was published in 2007, the Spidey-flick appeared three years earlier in 2004. Total Film has definitely changed its style and appearance but my point is, the content of the reviews haven’t differed significantly. The red lines illustrate the similarities between the two pieces despite their contrasting appearances. This goes to show the formula involved in film reviews.
It might be interesting to note from these reviews featuring pieces from the “Twilight” saga that the reviewing magazine has a lot of control over the appearance of the film. The two films being discussed are visually similar in style however, they are presented very differently by Empire Magazine and First Magazine. You can see this contrast above. While the review must emulate the style of the film this goes to show it can be manipulative.